Cronkite Header

Cronkite News has moved to a new home at Use this site to search archives from 2011 to May 2015. You can search the new site for current stories.

Arizona officials call for a halt to ‘devastating’ hatchery changes

Email this story
Print this story

WASHINGTON – Arizona officials told a House panel Wednesday that the federal government’s decision to end a rainbow trout program at the Willow Beach fish hatchery could have a devastating impact on the state’s economy.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said last year it planned to stop sport-fish production at the hatchery after 52 years there. Local officials said they rely on the hatchery for tourism dollars, and were never consulted on the decision to end the trout program.

“Once the fish are gone, the fisherman will be gone. Then we will have nothing,” said Mohave County Supervisor Hildy Angius, during a sometimes-testy hearing before a House Natural Resources subcommittee.

Angius and Arizona Game and Fish Commission Chairman Robert Mansell were in Washington to testify in support of a bill by Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Prescott, that would require a more-stringent review before U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service could stop hatchery programs.

The Fish Hatchery Protection Act would require congressional approval before the service could close or otherwise significantly alter operations at a federal fish hatchery.

Gosar said he introduced the bill after the service began making changes to several hatcheries last year as part of a new strategic plan, without first notifying state or local agencies.

Fish and Wildlife Deputy Director Steve Guertin said the service “strongly opposes” the bill, saying it would “jeopardize our ability to fulfill our ongoing legal obligations, respond to new and constantly evolving environmental challenges.”

The bill would also limit the agency’s ability to restore native fish and protect endangered species, Guertin said.

Gosar said he understood those needs, but said the service had “absolutely no right” to make such significant changes without first notifying the communities that would be affected.

“Shame on you, absolutely shame on you,” a visibly angry Gosar said, in response to what he called Guertin’s “pathetic excuses” for the proposed hatchery changes.

Mansell testified that hatcheries are “vital to Arizona and the nation’s economies.” He said Arizona relies not only on in-state hatcheries, but on others around the country.

They provide “immense economic and environmental benefits to rural economies … like Mohave County that depend on outdoor recreation and tourism to survive,” he said.

“Over 636, 000 people fish in Arizona annually, resulting in an estimated fishing expenditures of over $1.5 billion annually,” Mansell said in his testimony.

Mansell testified that local officials only learned about the service’s plans for Willow Beach after 40,000 trout died at the hatchery, and the service said it could not afford repairs to a water pipeline that could have fixed the problem.

After that news was out, Mansell said, Willow Beach became “ground zero” as other states learned about similar plans for their hatcheries.

Angius said in her prepared testimony that local officials estimated that Willow Beach repairs could be done for as little as $300,000, not the $3 million to $9 million she said federal officials cited.

“We’re at a breaking point in the West,” she said. “And Arizona will do whatever it takes to preserve its environment.”